The mythology referenced and
invented in the original Hellboy series
is so all encompassing and intricate that there is no obviously clear dogmatic
or narrative foundation. It draws on everything from Aleister Crowley to the
European Witch Craze to traditional Irish and English folklore to Dante’s Divine Comedy to the tropes of 1940’s
pulps in order to fill out the storyworld and expound the exploits of the
reluctant Beast of the Apocalypse. It’s dizzying.
The
narrative qua plot is complex enough, but can be summarized clearly, if not
succinctly. I will not do so here. Go read Hellboy.
However, it is the nature of the underlying mythology that I find most
interesting because is so broad, and to my eye, potentially vague. I don’t mean
this as a criticism in any way. Hellboy
is one of my favorite comics titles to date and I love the feeling of reading stories
that take place in such a deep, dense, and lived-in storyworld. The narratives
take place in a world that (rendered in Mignola’s minimalist noir-infused art
style) feels ancient and expansive.
Still, the mythological world, the
expectations built by the implied rules of this fantasy world are unclear and
this allows for a fair amount of genre bending (e.g., hard-boiled pulp, horror,
high fantasy, science fiction). This strategy for dealing with the core
mythological structures of narratives reminds me of the tactic of Grant
Morrison and (to a lesser extent) Alan Moore. Moore’s uses of occult and
religious systems are intensely intricate, but do have an air of coherence. It
may be that a more astute or determined reader than myself could understand,
for example, the Hermetic system of magic that Moore puts forth in Promethea to a workable degree. To be
honest, I never thought that the return would be worth the investment to attempt
to understand Moore’s esoteric cosmology in more than a superficial way.
Morrison seems to import any religious or cultural references at his disposal
into his comics, coherence be damned. His narratives recklessly swerve from
referencing Britpop bands to engaging with the ideas of chaos magicians.
Mike Mignola’s
Hellboy functions in much the same
way to these two examples. Mignola draws from highly disparate sources, which
rely on potentially mutually exclusive cosmological systems. And rather than
confusing the reader, this potpourri of mythology serves to create a general
emotional tone, a feeling, an aesthetic. The world of Hellboy is ill-defined, fantastical, and amorphous. Many cultural
artifacts that are influenced by Western esotericism and occultism seem to
follow this method. To some extent, this seems to be a response to and
rejection of the highly propositional, dogmatic, and belief-focused mainstream
religions in the U.S. (namely, Western-style Christianities). The Protestant
Christianities that have always been highly influential in the United States are
focused on adherents accepting propositional beliefs, which are (or often
purport to be) part of a coherent theological system of beliefs.
The
occultisms of Crowley, Blavatsky, and Mignola’s Hellboy storyworld, seem to purposefully buck this expectation for
metaphysical and mythological coherence and instead, weave an occultist aesthetic,
which can permeate the mood and emotions of practitioners and/or readers.
No comments:
Post a Comment